Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ken taylor's avatar

kind of waiting to read this series together...

I think we can agree that AI intelligence is only a comp. of stolen human intelligence. As you hit here upon here of course is how that theft is a means of making the works of human arts and thoughts less meaningful than its machine comp...and starting around one-hundred fifty years human labor became less meaningful than machine labor..

a parallel might be the story of John Henry..it was not that John Henry's was less efficient, he was beaten because the machine didn't rest.

But the thing is John Henry's work was efficiently and enduringly completed only by means of human labor. The machine required much more energy to do the same task but the results were less enduring products, they broke down, they didn't endure and overall required more energy to accomplish tasks that couldn't stand the test of time as well as the human's effort did.

But that was the benefit to the "grifter"... more could be made even if a lesser quality that required even more to be made and humans were doubly penalized by the grifter...first their labor was deemed less necessary and profits soared as inefficiency required increased purchasing of the same item; prices soared because the inefficient methodology of production required greater abuse and expanded use of resources which both doubled price due to inefficiency and doubled profit due to vertical monopolization of incorporation.

Good efficient human produced crafts remained higher priced but probably not going to break down and thus cheaper but presented as beyond the means to purchase increasing the need for the human craftsman to increase his price even more as his sales plummeted

Enter AI, and we have the same inefficiency;the same overabundance or excess of "supply" that increased demand only because of its inefficient result.

and of course the goal is to diminish human intelligence in the same way human labor was diminished, not because human labor or intelligence is lesser but by making it of lesser importance the controller of the "intelligence" (technological effort) gets more and controls more (inc. resources necessary for others to labor in thought) can make true human thought less attractive by being able to underbid it with substandard intelligence.

Cairenn Weaver's avatar

Good points. The white light at the end of the tunnel, is that AI generated content reeks and it's flooding the marketplace. But, people are already tired of it - only true creativity shines through. Most likely ... looking into my slighty cloudy crystal ball, AI will end up coordinating a new revenue model. I don't know what they could look like, but something that gives musicians and artists more direct control over the distribution and revenue of their work. AI is a tool (remember: input/output) like Google search is a tool ... it can't go the distance by itslef, only human creativity and innovation can.

27 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?